Skip to main content

Make vs Zapier: 2026 Comparison

Pricing, features, compliance — the honest guide

Make vs Zapier - automation comparison 2026
Comparison
By Victor
12 min read

Make or Zapier? That's THE question every SME looking to automate is asking. Two tools, two philosophies, two very different pricing models.

This comparison goes beyond feature tables. We cover real costs, learning curve, maintenance, and most importantly: European compliance (AI Act & GDPR) — an angle that 99% of comparisons ignore.

TL;DR: The verdict

Choose Zapier if: You want maximum simplicity, budget isn't a concern, and you only have basic automations (< 5 steps).

Choose Make if: You want more power for less money, you're willing to learn a more complex interface, and your processes are sophisticated.

Choose neither if: You want to sleep peacefully. Both are still DIY with maintenance on your shoulders and compliance unmanaged.

1. Introducing both tools

Zapier: the no-code pioneer

Founded in 2011, Zapier invented the concept of the "Zap": a simple automation connecting two apps via a trigger and an action. It's the undisputed leader with 7,000+ integrations.

Its strength? Simplicity. Even someone with zero technical skills can create their first Zap in 10 minutes.

Make (formerly Integromat): the European challenger

Created in 2016 in Prague (Czech Republic), Make initially targeted advanced users with a more powerful visual approach. Acquired by Celonis in 2022, it has established itself as the serious alternative with 1,800+ integrations.

Its strength? Flexibility and price. You can do things that are impossible on Zapier, for far less money.

2. Price comparison: the real cost

This is often THE deciding factor. Let's look at the 2026 numbers:

Plan Zapier Make
Free 100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios
Entry-level 29 EUR/month (750 tasks) 9 EUR/month (10,000 ops)
Pro 89 EUR/month (2,000 tasks) 16 EUR/month (10,000 ops)
Team 588 EUR/month (50,000 tasks) 29 EUR/month (10,000 ops)

The Zapier trap: A "task" = one step. A 5-step workflow consumes 5 tasks. With Make, only operations that manipulate data count.

Real-world example: 1,000 orders/month

Imagine an e-commerce business with 1,000 orders/month. Each order triggers:

  1. Slack notification
  2. CRM customer creation
  3. Invoice generation
  4. Confirmation email
  5. Dashboard update

Zapier

1,000 x 5 steps = 5,000 tasks/month

Plan needed: Team (588 EUR/month)

= 7,056 EUR/year

Make

1,000 x 5 operations = 5,000 ops/month

Plan needed: Core (9 EUR/month)

= 108 EUR/year

Ratio: Make is 65x cheaper for the same result in this example.

3. Features and power

Feature Zapier Make
Native integrations 7,000+ 1,800+
Loops (iterations) No Yes
Conditional logic Paid plans All plans
Routers (branches) Limited Unlimited
Error handling Basic Advanced
Webhooks Paid plans All plans
Custom HTTP/API Yes Yes
JSON manipulation Limited Full
Internal database Tables (paid) Data stores

Feature verdict: Make wins by a wide margin. More power, more flexibility, on all plans.

4. Ease of use

This is where Zapier takes back the advantage.

Zapier: 10/10 simplicity

  • Intuitive linear interface
  • Step-by-step guided assistant
  • Ready-to-use templates
  • Excellent documentation
  • Learning time: 30 minutes

Make: 6/10 simplicity

  • Flowchart-style visual interface
  • More powerful = more complex
  • Concepts to understand (modules, bundles)
  • Decent documentation
  • Learning time: 2-4 hours
"Zapier is like driving an automatic car. Make is like driving a manual with more control, but you need to learn."

5. AI Act & GDPR compliance

Here's the angle that nobody ever covers in comparisons. And yet it's crucial for European SMEs in 2026.

The GDPR challenge

GDPR Criteria Zapier Make
Headquarters USA EU (Prague)
EU hosting Optional (paid) By default
DPA available Yes Yes
Non-EU transfers Yes (SCCs required) Avoidable
Processing register Do it yourself Do it yourself

Make's advantage: Being European, Make simplifies GDPR compliance. But in both cases, documentation and the register remain your responsibility.

The new challenge: the AI Act

Since February 2025, the EU AI Act imposes obligations if your automations use AI:

Examples of affected automations:

  • A Zap that uses OpenAI/ChatGPT to summarize emails
  • A Make scenario that automatically classifies support tickets
  • An automation that generates responses to customers
  • A workflow that does AI-powered lead scoring

For these cases, the AI Act requires:

  • Transparency: inform that AI is being used
  • Documentation: trace AI decisions
  • Human oversight: provide manual validations for certain decisions

Neither Zapier nor Make handles this for you

Both platforms provide the tool. AI Act compliance? That's 100% your responsibility. And penalties can reach 3% of global turnover.

6. Our recommendation

Choose Zapier if:

  • Your automations are very simple (< 5 steps)
  • You have no technical skills
  • Budget isn't a concern
  • You don't use AI in your workflows
  • You need a rare app not available on Make

Choose Make if:

  • Your automations are complex (loops, conditions)
  • You want to save 50-90% on costs
  • You have some time to learn
  • GDPR compliance is a priority
  • You like having control over your workflows

7. The third way: what if you didn't have to choose?

Zapier or Make, both share a fundamental problem: they're DIY.

  • You design the architecture
  • You maintain things when they break
  • You document for compliance
  • You handle errors at 3 AM

For an SME that wants critical, reliable, and compliant automations, there's a third way: expert support.

What JAIKIN brings vs Zapier/Make alone:

  • Custom architecture: We design your workflows based on your real needs
  • Proactive maintenance: We monitor and fix BEFORE things break
  • Compliance included: GDPR and AI Act documentation delivered
  • Sovereign hosting: n8n on French servers if needed
  • Guaranteed ROI: We commit to results

We actually use n8n (open-source) for our clients, which combines the best of both worlds: the power of Make, total flexibility, sovereign hosting, and zero licensing costs.

Need help choosing?

A 30-minute assessment to analyze your needs and recommend the best approach — tool alone or expert support.